...otherwise known as "The resignation was not given but demanded; the sequel."
As with the NBN, so (it seems) with the Australian Greens.
Here, link courtesy of Andrew Bolt, is the source article at the Sydney Morning Herald website.
The text, quoted in full in the event of redaction or modification, is as follows:
Christine Milne has survived an aborted push to challenge her
leadership - but some senior Greens claim the Tasmanian senator is now
''living on borrowed time''.
Fairfax Media can reveal the departure of Senator Milne's
most senior political aide, Ben Oquist, is linked to moves within the
federal party to switch to Adam Bandt, her deputy.
A source close to the turmoil inside the leader's office said
Senator Milne had demanded the resignation of Mr Oquist, her chief of
staff, after she became aware he had backed moves for Mr Bandt to mount a
challenge at Monday's party room meeting.
''This is about disloyalty. Ben was trying to get rid of
Christine. Adam Bandt was going to make a run for the leadership, but
they called it off about an hour before party room because they didn't
have the numbers,'' the source said.
Another Greens source confirmed a push to replace Senator Milne was
on, but there was ''not enough confidence they had the numbers''.
Senator Milne's office declined to make any comment on Thursday and Mr Bandt, who is on holiday, could not be reached.
Senator Milne fronted the media alongside Mr Bandt after
Monday's meeting to declare both leader and deputy had been re-elected
to their positions unopposed. ''We are a strong, united team,'' she
Three days later, she had lost Mr Oquist and five other senior policy and media staff.
Senator Milne said the ''flat administrative structure'' she
imposed when she took over from Bob Brown was the reason Mr Oquist had
moved on. ''I think Ben had a view that it should be more
hierarchical,'' she said.
Mr Oquist is travelling overseas and has made no statement
other than he left on good terms, but ''fundamental differences of
opinion in strategy had emerged''.
Well, now. This does shoot a fairly large hole in the suppositions from my last article; it seems some within the Greens wasted no time deciding they had been led to an avoidable defeat and that action to remove the one responsible was required. And yeah, I have to admit, if I found out that my Chief of Staff had been whispering to the "Other Side" within my own ranks without being frank to me about it, I'd probably send them packing too.
I'd love to know just what this "flat administrative structure" is all about. Hierarchy is important in a political organisation; people need to know who's boss and just where the buck stops.